1. The Defendant: 3,900,000 won for Plaintiff A; 2,700,000 won for Plaintiff B; 2,900,000 won for Plaintiff C; and 2,900 won for Plaintiff D.

1. In full view of the purport of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3 as to the cause of the claim and the purport of the entire pleadings, the plaintiffs are recognized as having provided labor as a tree at the construction site, etc. under employment by the defendant from May 29, 2015 to June 24, 2015, and during the above period, at the construction site, in Jeju H, the defendant; the plaintiff A; the plaintiff Eul; the plaintiff Eul; the plaintiff Eul; the plaintiff Eul; the plaintiff Eul; the plaintiff Eul; the plaintiff Eul; the 2,900,000,000, the plaintiff Eul; the plaintiff Eul; the 2,600,00,000, the plaintiff Eul; the plaintiff Eul; the 2,600,000,000, the plaintiff Eul; the plaintiff Eul; and the 2,600,000,000, and the plaintiff G had not been paid each wage of KRW 2,50,000.

(1) The defendant is obligated to pay damages for delay calculated at the rate of 20% per annum as provided by the Labor Standards Act from July 9, 2015 to the day of full payment to the plaintiff, as claimed by the plaintiff, to the effect that the remaining plaintiffs except the plaintiff A did not provide labor to the defendant, but the defendant merely ordered the plaintiff to work for the plaintiff A, but in light of the above evidence Nos. 2 and 3, the defendant's above assertion is not accepted. According to the above facts of recognition, the defendant is obligated to pay damages for delay calculated at the rate of 3,900,700,000,000 to the plaintiff Eul, 2,60,000,000, and 2,600,000,000 to the plaintiff Eul, and 2,50,000,0000,000 to the plaintiff Eul, as the plaintiff's last working day from the date of the plaintiff's final work to the day of full payment.

2. Conclusion, the plaintiffs' claims are justified, and all of them are accepted.