logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2014.03.20 2014고정324
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동재물손괴등)등
Text

Defendant

A and B shall be punished by a fine of 3,000,000 won, Defendant C and D by a fine of 1,000,000 won.

The defendants are the defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 16:00 on February 1, 2013, the Defendants conspired to operate a restaurant directly by occupying a restaurant on the ground that the victims H, I, J, and K did not pay meals equivalent to KRW 31 million in arrears of the meal costs of the above hospital’s operation and management of the restaurant at the 4th floor of the G Hospital located in the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City.

1. On February 1, 2013, Defendants in violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint destruction, damage, etc.) opened at the 10th floor restaurant of the above 10th floor of the building, and destroyed and damaged the victim H market door opened at the cafeteria by opening one locked of the market value owned by the victim H, which was installed at the cafeteria, at a cafeteria, and damaged the cafeteria’s office. The market price owned by the victim I opened one 1001 L Association office used by the victim I and one Association signboard of the association shall be removed, removed, removed, destroyed, and removed, and then the victim J-owned market price installed at the cafeteria’s cafeteria’s cafeteria’s cafeteria’s cafeteria’s cafeteria’s cafeteria’s gate installed at a cafeteria’s cafeteria’s cafeteria’s cafeteria’s cafeteria’s cafeteria’s gate’s gate.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly destroyed the locks of the above victims, thereby impairing their usefulness.

2. The Defendants interfered with their business by destroying the locks of the said victims at the above date, time, and place in the same manner as Paragraph 1, and by installing new locks, thereby obstructing the victim J, H’s legitimate restaurant operation, and the victim K’s legitimate restaurant operation, and the victim I’s building management duties, respectively.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to interfere with the legitimate work of the victims.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of the Defendants (as of the second trial date)

1. Application of each statute on police statements made to H, I, J, and K;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment (for the accused), respectively;

arrow