A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

"2016 Highest 8255"

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a rocketing or other car in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury to Dangerous Driving) and the Road Traffic Act.

On October 21, 2016, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol content of 0.175% in blood at around 02:00 and continued to drive the said car at about 50km in the direction of the distance from the direction of entertainment to the direction of the F store located in Bupyeong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City.

In such cases, there was a duty of care to properly operate the brakes by properly operating the brakes while living well in the driver of the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and failed to properly operate the front of the instant car, and caused the victim G(45 ) who stops into the signal signal atmosphere at the front of the instant car due to the negligence of not operating the front of the instant taxi and the brake system.

Ultimately, the Defendant driving the said car in a state where it is difficult to drive the car normally due to influence of drinking, and suffered injury to the victim G, such as light dynasium in need of treatment for about three weeks, and injury to the victim I (3) who was on board the said taxi in need of treatment for about two weeks, such as dynasium in need of treatment for about two weeks, and injury to the victim J (40) who was on board the said taxi in need of treatment for about three weeks, and injury to the victim K (40 years of age) who was on board the said taxi in need of treatment for about two weeks.

"2017 Highest 1982"

2. A special confinement Defendant: (a) was living together in around August 2016 with the victim L(the age of 36) who became aware of access to the smartphone-based mobile phone gate; (b) on the ground that around February 13, 2017, around 05:00, the Defendant attempted to arrange the living together of the said victim and return to the same where her husband and her husband are born.