The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is as follows: (a) the Defendant, the father of the Victim B, claimed that he had not received approximately KRW 700 million wage after obtaining labor force of the “construction for electric power source facilities between Gyeong-line D” from the Defendant, and did not accept it; (b) on October 15, 2013, the Defendant sent the victim the victim’s name, “I want to see that “I want to see if I will see that I will see it with the name of the said E, “I will see the hospital building, bank building, and building two or more buildings, so I will return it to I am, I will see that I will see that I will see that I will die if I will see it. I will see that I will die. I will see if I will see it.”

On October 31, 2013, the Defendant sent a letter to the Seoul Special Metropolitan City F, Gwanak-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City F, a residence of the victim, stating that “Abro bMta and good dynasium bM, but it is very difficult to live together with it, and in particular, night paths are even more and more and more and more early, the Defendant threatened the victim.”

2. The facts charged in this part of the judgment are those falling under Article 283(1) of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent in accordance with Article 283(3) of the Criminal Act.

On March 10, 2015, after the prosecution of this case, the victim B prepared a written application for non-prosecution of punishment and submitted it to this court.

Therefore, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.