1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, which cited this case, is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for a case where a part of the reasoning is high, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

In the same part, the reasons of the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows: 4-6 to 7-7-7-7.

D. On June 8, 2011, the Plaintiff: (a) to the Defendants, the amount of money in the instant judgment (hereinafter “instant amount”).

The Defendants notified the completion of the preparation for payment and notified the receipt thereof. On June 10, 2011, the Defendants issued the foregoing peremptory notice (hereinafter “instant peremptory notice”).

The grounds of the judgment of the first instance are as follows. The fifth to fifth to fifth are as follows.

(g) On December 6, 2018, the Plaintiff paid 112,177,190 won (i.e., the remainder interest excluding delay damages from June 11, 201 to October 16, 2015 from the date following the date on which the Defendants received the instant peremptory notice from the Defendants (i.e., the Plaintiff’s payment of delay damages from June 11, 201 to October 16, 201) (i.e., the principal amount of the instant judgment of KRW 61,225,690 from April 4, 2009 to October 22, 2010; 20% per annum from October 23, 2010 to June 10, 2011 to December 26, 2018) as follows.

“A. The Defendants are premised on the existence of a claim for delay damages against the instant judgment amount from June 11, 201 to October 16, 2015, under the premise that the said claim for delay damages exists, the amount of the said claim for delay damages from June 11, 2011 to October 16, 2015, to July 12, 2019, namely, the amount of the remainder of the judgment payment from July 11, 201 to the claim for each of the instant judgment amount, i.e., the “current appeal judgment” in the first instance judgment, i.e., the “current appeal judgment (Seoul Central District Court 20

The grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows, from 7th to 8th 4th .

At this time, the matters forming the cause of the lawsuit demanding objection shall be indicated in the executive titles.