Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 3, 2012, the Defendant: (a) around 20:30, the victim’s O (year 65) seated next to the victim, who was seated by mobile phones in the Nancheon-si, Youngcheon-si D, was slick; (b) the victim’s face was slicked twice due to drinking, and was slicked, the Defendant slicked the victim’s face for about two weeks.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties by assaulting the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the handling of reporting duties by committing assaulting the Defendant and the PO fighting team affiliated with the Heacheon Police Station, which was called out after receiving a report from the saidO at the time and place specified in paragraph (1) of this Article, by assaulting the Defendant and the PO fighting team, such as making the left part of the said P twice by drinking with satise and drinking with saton two times.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning each police suspect examination against theO;

1. Statement of the police statement on P;

1. Request for cooperation in investigation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on internal investigation reports (including field situations, etc., attachment of a copy of a work log, and attachment of photographs of damaged parts);

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act, Articles 257 (1) and 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act (Aggravation of concurrent crimes with punishment prescribed for heavier injury);

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act in Article 334(1) includes a large number of violent crimes, as well as the Defendant committed the instant crime without being aware of the fact that he was committed during the period of repeated crime, and thus, it is necessary to strictly punish the Defendant. However, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol and has committed the instant crime, and the Defendant committed the instant crime by contingency, and the degree of the Defendant’s assault against the police officer, and the victim did not want the Defendant’s punishment by agreement with the victim B, and the Defendant does not want the Defendant.