logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2020.04.24 2019고단2225
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 2014, the Defendant committed early 2014, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim D on the C real estate operated by the Defendant in Pyeongtaek-si B, stating, “I will be able to obtain large profits from market prices by attracting 250,000,000 won as we emitted from the land, making it possible to make sure that I would be able to obtain large profits from the market prices by attracting the victims of the C real estate, such as attracting the tourist complex, attracting the tea, attracting the tea, attracting the history, etc. in the vicinity of Pyeongtaek-si.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not have any property or income in excess of his/her obligation, and there was no intention or ability to purchase real estate for the victim, or to obtain profits from the market price through the unregistered pre-sale, because he/she was willing to repay the money borrowed from the victim's living expenses or others.

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, transferred the victim to the E bank account in the name of the suspect, KRW 10 million from the victim on June 11, 2014; KRW 5 million on June 24, 2014; and KRW 70 million on June 7, 2014; and

8. By April 8, 200, KRW 100 million received and delivered KRW 250 million in total.

2. On September 13, 2015, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim D on September 13, 2015, stating that “F will sell the land to the victim and borrow the land on the land. To participate in the business, 30 million won shall be prepared as the down payment once it comes up to the cover. On the other hand, for six months, the Defendant may bring profits exceeding 100 million won in addition to the investment principal,” the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant may bring profits exceeding 100 million won in addition to the investment principal.”

However, in fact, the defendant was in excess of his/her obligation due to the absence of any particular property or income, and he/she actually thought that he/she would repay the money borrowed from the victim to another person, so even if he/she receives money from the victim, the F.

arrow