logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2018.05.25 2018고단151
도로교통법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than four months and a fine not exceeding three hundred thousand won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant in violation of the Road Traffic Act is a person who is engaged in the driving of the 100CC at B City.

On November 10, 2017, the Defendant, without a motor engine bicycle license, driven the above occba, while driving the occa, and driving the occa in front of the D cafeteria in Jeju, to the hotel of the eccacy in front of the D cafeteria at Jeju, while driving the ecca, from the ecca, to the hotel of the ecca.

Since there is a place where the center line of yellow solid lines is installed, there was a duty of care to ensure that a person engaged in driving service should thoroughly operate the front line and the left line and the right line.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while driving a motor device bicycle without a driver's license, has been driving with the central line her only by the negligence of being snicked with the central line, and was driving on the snick-water snives or right to the snives

E Driving followed the left-hand side of the FM6 riding line, the upper part was shocked on the right-hand side of the upper part.

Defendant damaged the said SM6 car owned by the Victim Hansan Liber Co., Ltd. by negligence in the course of the above business so as to cover KRW 1,459,433 of the repair cost.

2. On November 10, 2017, the Defendant, in violation of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving), driven the 100CC at approximately 3 km section from Jeju to Jeju, without a motor device license, from around 18:30 on November 10, 2017 to the front day of the D cafeteria located at the coast of Jeju.

3. The Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation Act, on the date and place specified in paragraph (2), operated the foregoing Oba on the part of the Defendant who did not subscribe to mandatory insurance.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A traffic accident-related statement of E;

1. A report on internal investigation and a survey report on actual sulfur (1) (2);

1. An accident scene photograph;

1. The driver's license ledger (A);

1. The next time table, the mandatory insurance (OM6), and the next time table (SM6);

1. Application of the written estimate statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act (the occupation of damage to duties and real property and the choice of imprisonment without prison labor) concerning the facts constituting an offense;

arrow