logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.11.14 2013가합563844
손해배상(기)
Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. At the time of the instant fire, the Plaintiffs leased the E-ground building owned by D at the time of the instant fire, and kept PET films and various machinery, etc., and the Defendant C Co., Ltd. leased the building consisting of D’s malju F, G-ground and other general steel-frame light teams, which were immediately adjacent thereto, and engaged in the production, supply, etc. of sculptures. The Defendant Samsung Fire Marine Insurance Co., Ltd. is an insurer who concluded a fire insurance contract with Defendant C with regard to the instant factory building.

(B) In this case, Defendant Samsung Fire Co., Ltd. and Defendant Samsung Fire Co., Ltd. and the building leased by the Plaintiffs is the warehouse building of this case and the building leased by Defendant C).

On March 24, 2013, at around 02:16, a fire occurred in the factory building of this case (hereinafter referred to as the “fire of this case”), and thereafter, the fire was destroyed by the fire, such as the Plaintiff-owned greeners, joint landers, etc. and the PE films, etc. owned by the Plaintiff B.

C. According to the results of the fire site investigation in the wave fire station, accurate point and cause of fire extinguishment cannot be specified, and electric factors or possibility of fire prevention cannot be excluded.

The police made a decision to the effect that the specific cause of fire can not be known.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1-4 evidence (including branch numbers), Eul 1-9 evidence, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The plaintiffs' assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiffs' assertion that Defendant C made the instant fire by using FRP (FRP) in the instant factory building, etc., and by not properly managing it, Defendant C had caused the instant fire by negligence. Thus, pursuant to Article 758 of the Civil Act, Defendant C is obliged to compensate the damages suffered by the plaintiffs due to the instant fire.

arrow