A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On May 27, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 22:15, at the Defendant’s house located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, the Defendant: (b) while the Defendant’s wife D conflicts with the Defendant’s wife D, the Victim E (the age of 25) was kid, with the Defendant’s kids, and the Defendant’s face at least three times with the Defendant’s kids, the Defendant her hand, her hand, and her golf loans (spati part) with approximately two times the head of the victim’s head at approximately two weeks; and (c) the Defendant got approximately two weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol of examination of part of the defendant by prosecution;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (Evidence 2, 3 and 4);

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel's assertion on the assertion of the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 62 (1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (hereinafter referred to as "the grounds for sentencing") are as follows: the defendant made the victim's face one time with the floor of hand, with golf loans, and did not have any intention to inflict any injury at the time; however, the defendant argued that there was no intention to inflict any injury at the time. However, in addition to the whole purport of the evidence duly adopted and duly examined by this court, the following circumstances, i.e., the defendant was found to have taken three face of the victim with the driver's seat at hand, 3 times with golf loans, 2.5 cm in diameter, 100 cm in length, and 100 cm in length, as a whole, the above golf loans were made by the defendant, and the victim was damaged by the defendant's crime, and the victim did not have any intention to inflict any injury to the defendant at least as stated in the judgment, and thus, the defendant did not have any injury to the defendant at the above.