1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

Purport of claim and appeal

1.

1. The reasoning for the court's explanation of this case is as follows: "3,47,920 won" 3,162,480 won ; "2,68,070 won ; "2,46,150 won ; 79,850 won ; '79,850 won ; '79,850 won ; '2,466,850 won '; '2,46,150 won '; '79,850 won '; '2,46,30 won '; '69,30 won '; 'the ground for recognition' - - 2,3,4,4,5, 8 of the first instance judgment; 'the whole purport of the pleadings' - - - - - - 3,4,5,8 of the first instance judgment - - - - - -

2. Additional matters to be determined

A. As to the limitation of liability due to the fluence of the Defendants, the Defendants asserted that: (a) the instant accident occurred in the course of Defendant A’s participation in the fluence of the Defendant A to the place of the fluence; and (b) the restriction on liability due to the fluence of the Defendant A, a driver, should be imposed on the part of the fluence; and (c) the fluence of the fluence of the fluence of the fluence of the fluence of the fluence of the fluence of the fluence of the fluence of the fluence of the fluence of the fluence of the fluence of the fluence of the fluence of the fluence of the fluence of the fluence of the fluence of the fluence of the fluence of the fluence of the fluence of the fluence of the fluence of the f.

(Supreme Court Decision 98Da53141 delivered on February 9, 199, etc.). 7: (a) According to the entry in B, the fact that B was the same as that of the Defendant A and the Eunpyeong Elementary School; and (b) the instant accident was caused by the Defendant A to share the same with the vehicle, and then to the same group of the above elementary school.