logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2016.11.24 2016고단1795
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant provided three guest rooms with bed and shower rooms on the third floor of the C-Sapo City in Seocho-si, and operated D, and arranged sexual traffic for the business of arranging sexual traffic by arranging to receive KRW 120,000 won from male customers who found the place, and distributing KRW 6-70,000 among them to sexual traffic women. On April 6, 2016, around 23:59, the Defendant was engaged in sexual traffic by arranging to receive KRW 120,000 for sexual traffic and to have sexual intercourse with E who is female sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. E statements;

1. The investigation report (with regard to circumstances of control); and

1. Application of related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic and the Selection of Imprisonment with labor concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing);

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. The scope of recommendations on the sentencing guidelines [the scope of recommendations] shall be limited to the scope of recommendations [the scope of recommendations] 19 years of age or older, the brokerage of commercial sex acts, etc. (the brokerage, etc. of commercial sex acts due to the business, the giving and receiving of prices, etc.).

2. Determination of sentence: The Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, method of committing the act of arranging sexual traffic, size of business place and profit, circumstances after committing the act, sentencing precedent in similar cases, and other various conditions of sentencing specified in the pleadings of this case shall be taken into account. In particular, the following circumstances shall be considered: (a) the Defendant, while engaging in arranging sexual traffic for business purposes at the same place as the place where the instant crime was committed; (b) despite having been issued a summary order of KRW 5 million as a crime of violating the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. on December 18, 2015, continuously engaging in arranging sexual traffic for business purposes, despite having been ordered to do so,

(k) favorable circumstances:

arrow