1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. Facts of recognition;

가. 장비구매계약과 계약보증금채무 원고는 2006. 2. 3. 1심 공동피고 가은개발 주식회사(이하 ‘가은개발’이라 한다)와 사이에, 가은개발이 원고로부터 부산 민락동 가은아파트의 홈네트웍시스템에 필요한 장비를 납품기간을 2008. 12. 31.로 하여 계약금액 1,309,451,000원에 구매하되, 원고가 가은개발에 계약보증금 130,945,100원을 납부하기로 하는 내용의 장비구매계약(이하 ‘이 사건 장비구매계약’이라 한다)을 체결하였다.

B. On February 17, 2006, in lieu of the actual payment of the contract deposit under the instant equipment purchase contract, the Plaintiff entered into a pledge agreement with the Defendant for KRW 131 million among the deposit claims listed below (hereinafter “first deposit claim”, and the remaining deposit claims shall be specified according to the number in the column in the table below) as against the Defendant in order to secure the obligation of the contract deposit between Ga Development and Ga Development, and the Defendant consented to the establishment of the pledge agreement for provisional development.

C. On April 27, 2010, after the maturity date of each deposit transaction between the Plaintiff and the Defendant, a substitute transaction with the second deposit account with the maturity of 131 million won equivalent to the above contract deposit deposit deposit deposit deposit deposit amounting to the second deposit account with the maturity of 1.3 million won deposited into another deposit account by withdrawing the money in the deposit account. In the event of a substitute transaction with the head of a Tong, the bank deposit account shall be prepared with respect to the deposit account with the money, and the amount in the deposit account shall be transferred to another deposit account by submitting the deposit deposit slip to the bank counter.

At the time of the substitute transaction, the plaintiff has the effect of establishing a pledge to the defendant's deposit claim, and it is due to the re-deposit of the object of pledge.