The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The gist of the facts charged is that the Defendant is the husband and wife of the victim B. On October 25, 2016, the Defendant assaulted the victim’s external appearance at the center of the victim of D 2 cafeteria, the victim’s external appearance at the house of the victim of D 19:0 on October 25, 2016, and the victim expressed his/her desire to read “I am the victim said,” “I am the victim said, I am the victim “I am the end of the year, I do not am the case, I do not am the case, I am the victim’s body, and am the body with the wall, and am the head with his/her hand.”

2. The part of the instant assault is a crime falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act. According to the records, the facts can be acknowledged on April 10, 2017, which was after the instant indictment was instituted, that the victim expressed his/her intention not to have the Defendant punished. Thus, the instant indictment is dismissed pursuant to Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.