Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of a fixed-franking cargo vehicle C.

On December 1, 2014, the Defendant driven the above vehicle on December 12:35, 2014, and proceeded to turn to the left the two-lane road from the intersection of the intersection to the intersection of the two-lane road from the intersection of the intersection of the intersection of the other intersection of the intersection of the intersection of the intersection of the road.

At the same time, the signal lights are cross-road crossings where the left-hand turn and the right-hand turn are prohibited, and in such cases, the driver of the motor vehicle has the duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle according to the signal lights and the signal or instruction displayed by the traffic safety facilities.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to turn to the left in contravention of the signal and received a part behind the right part of the vehicle in front of the vehicle operated by the Defendant, following the Gone Star in operation of the victim F (39 years of age, south) who stops in the signal atmosphere.

As a result, the Defendant caused the above occupational negligence to the victim F with salt, tensions, etc., requiring three weeks of medical treatment, and applied to the chief passenger H (34 years of age and south) for three weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident and a report on a traffic accident;

1. A written diagnosis and written estimate;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for photograph explanation;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that "the defendant was in a state of mental disability due to the liveration at the time of the crime of this case" under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, but the defendant argued that "the defendant was in a state of mental disability."