1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On May 6, 2013, A, who is an employee of the Eastdong Power Co., Ltd., driven and moved the accusation work unit to work the second floor underground in an underground parking lot between 307-308 and 308 at the construction site of the new construction site B, with the accusation work unit (which has a wheels and has no power, but has no head of the Dong).

B. The same worker C (hereinafter referred to as the "victim") and D were moving a mobile accusation. However, while the accusation process was moving to the second basement parking lot through the underground parking lot m (sloping way), A and D were placed in the accusation work unit, the victim was faced with an accident (hereinafter referred to as the "accident in this case"). However, while the victim continued to catch and go beyond the accusation work cost, the victim was faced with an accident.

C. In the instant accident, the victim suffered injury from the instant accident “the pressure frame of the Third Twitter, the first Twelth Twelthrosis, the first Twelthrosis, the second and the fourth rlstrlstral alley, the 11ndral alley, the 12ndral alley, the upper left-hand side of the 12ndral alley, the external rlstropulation, the external rupture, the external rupture, the upper left-hand side of the 1 to 8th, and the 10th parallel, the external 2 to 6th of the right, the external rupture, the mathropical damage, the 3rdral damage and the pressure rupture, the rupture rupture of the rupture, the rupture rupture rupture and the rupture of the original b

The Plaintiff paid 68,161,060 won of temporary layoff benefits and 227,723,690 won of medical care benefits to the victims.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1, 3, 9, 10 evidence, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Assertion and determination

A. The plaintiff's assertion is that the defendant is the owner of the complaint work unit (the owner) and the owner of the product liability insurance, and is liable for damages to the victim pursuant to the relevant statutes, such as Article 750 of the Civil Act, and the plaintiff is the operator of the industrial accident compensation insurance business under the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act (hereinafter referred to as the "Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act"), who is the operator of the industrial accident compensation insurance business under the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act, shall pay the insurance benefits under the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act to the victim,