logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.05.25 2017고정590
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

The sentence against the accused shall be determined by a fine of KRW 3,00,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant is one of the husband B, who operates a car-free car in one’s husband B for commuting to and from work.

In spite of the fact that the Defendant is unable to operate a motor vehicle with no mandatory insurance, the Defendant is unable to operate a motor vehicle with no mandatory insurance, from February 5, 2017 to the same year.

2. From around 22:45, up to September 22:45, the Plaintiff operated a section of about 2 km from the food store in the Southern-gu in Gwangju-gu to the front day of the food store "Sae-gu Ro-ro" in the same Dong.

2. The defendant is a person who drives a vehicle under the preceding paragraph in violation of the Road Traffic Act;

On February 22:45, 2017, the Defendant driven the foregoing vehicle at approximately 2 km to the front of the food of “Neaeng Fari Fari Fari Fari Fari Fari Fari Fari Fari Fari Fari Fari Fari Fari Fari Fari Fari Fari, located in the Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Gwangju, under the influence of alcohol level 0.107% in alcohol level during blood.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Inquiry into mandatory insurance, and making a tea entry into the ship;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to reports on the detection of drivers engaged in driving and the statement of the circumstances of drivers engaged in driving;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Articles 148-2 (2) 2 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (the point of drinking), Article 46 (2) 2 and the main sentence of Article 8 of the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Act (the point of operating vehicles which are not mandatory insurance), and selection of fines, respectively;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is based on the following factors: (a) the sentencing conditions in the instant case, including the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, the background and result of the instant crime; and (b) the circumstances after the instant crime, etc., the sentence is determined as ordered.

A favorable normal situation: The defendant has been divided into and reflected in his mistake.

Until now, the defendant has lived faithfully without criminal records.

arrow