logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2018.03.16 2017고합205
아동ㆍ청소년의성보호에관한법률위반(강제추행)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 25, 2017, when the defendant lacks the ability to discern things or make decisions due to the trouble of her, etc., the defendant found the victim E (the name, her, her, her age 17) who had conversationsd with his/her West-gu, Annyang-si, Annyang-si, Annyang-si on July 25, 2017, and found the victim E (the name, her, her age 17) who was in conversation with his/her West-gu, and the victim's her arm's length with the victim's her own hand.

Accordingly, the Defendant committed an indecent act on the part of the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each statement made by the police in relation to E (tentative name);

1. Application of statutes on images of on-site photographs;

1. Article 298 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense and Article 298 of the Selection of Punishment Act;

1. Articles 10(2) and 10(1) and 55(1)6 of the Criminal Act for the mitigation of mental and physical weakness [the Defendant was diagnosed with the symptoms of depression and depression on April 9, 2008. The Defendant’s diagnosis on the following facts: “The Defendant shows a significant fall in the understanding of the social context and predicted ability, is restricted in the ability to interfere with and exchange another person’s emotional sentiment, and damage is increased in personal relationships, and the damage is likely to have a dynamic tendency in stress situations at a significant level (25th right of investigation record). The Defendant was given the investigative authority over the Defendant from around 207 to 207 to 27th day of the instant investigation report.”

In full view of the fact that “the Defendant answer to the purport of the instant crime” (the 19,20th (2nd) of the investigation record), other statement made by the Defendant to the investigation agency, actions in this court, etc., it is recognized that the Defendant had weak the ability to discern things or make decisions at the time of the instant crime).

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse.

arrow