1. The Defendant’s compulsory execution against the Plaintiff based on the Seoul Eastern District Court Decision 2015Da24686 Decided June 16, 2015.

In full view of the facts without dispute, Gap 1-4's statements and the purport of the entire pleadings, the defendant filed a lawsuit against the plaintiff as Seoul Eastern District Court 2015da24682. On June 16, 2015, the defendant decided that "the plaintiff shall pay to the defendant 14,801,966 won and 1,125,40 won among them at the rate of 24% per annum from March 28, 2015 to the day of full payment, 13,379,975 won, and 23% per annum from March 28, 2015 to the day of full payment." The above judgment became final and conclusive on July 14, 2015; the plaintiff shall be deemed to have deposited the defendant with the defendant on March 15, 2016 with the total amount of principal and interest of KRW 14,80 won and KRW 1,125,400, and shall be deemed to have been paid.

According to the above facts, since a debt based on the above judgment has ceased to exist due to repayment, compulsory execution based on the above judgment is no longer permissible.

If so, the plaintiff's claim is justified.