beta
Text
1. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the defendant (Counterclaim) that exceeds the money ordered to be paid below.
Reasons
1. Demand for principal lawsuit:
A. In light of the absence of dispute between the parties to the claim and the overall purport of Gap evidence 1-1, 2, and 3, the defendant issued and delivered three promissory notes (hereinafter "each of the Promissory Notes in this case") to the plaintiff as stated below, and the plaintiff holds each of the Promissory Notes in this case, and the plaintiff presented each of the Promissory Notes in each of the instant payment dates at each payment date, but all of the payment was rejected due to the acceptance of the accident report.
On August 30, 2009, the Bank of Seoul Industrial Bank of Korea on June 23, 2009, 23, 2009, F. 2, 173, 600 on July 23, 2009, 200 on the issue date of the bill number, 1D 1D on May 20, 2009 at the place of payment, and 2,860,000 on July 23, 2009, 209, the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff the sum of the face value of each of the Promissory Notes of this case, 7,893,600, and delay damages, barring any special circumstance.
B. The following facts can be acknowledged in full view of each of the entries in the evidence Nos. 1, 4, 5, 7, 14, 15, and 16 (including a serial number) and the whole purport of the arguments and arguments of the defendant's non-existent defenses (1) which are not disputed between the parties to the dispute or between the parties to the dispute.
(A) The Defendant, as the spouse of the network G, succeeded to the rights and duties of the manufacturer of the automobile parts (trade name: H) of the business chain in the name of the deceased as of November 4, 2004, and C, as the steering car of the deceased, was employed at H around May 1990 and was employed as the head of the factory and the vice president from July 1994 to June 2009. The Defendant, as the spouse of the network G, took overall control of the business, including the manufacture, supply, management of passbooks, issuance of bills, and execution of funds of the said company.
In addition, the plaintiff was a customer who engages in automobile-related parts business in the name of I and is supplied in accordance with H's order during the period of his/her service.
(b) C shall request the Customer to process or manufacture motor vehicle parts.