Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a member who attends the "E church" youth department in Gangdong-gu and is a person who attends the same church as the victim F (28 tax).

On July 3, 2016, the Defendant dialogueed with the head of the church in front of the office of the first floor of the above church on July 3, 2016, and had a high speech, on the ground that the injured person obstructed the entrance door of the office, pushed down his body, carried out his body, and carried out his body, the Defendant was inside the body of the injured person.

Accordingly, the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim, which requires treatment for about 14 days, on the part of the Defendant.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of F;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. A report on investigation (the confirmation of CCTVs against the defendant) and a photograph of a caps;

1. Application of CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes

1. Article 257 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Determination on the assertion by the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. With respect to whether an injury has occurred, the accused and his defense counsel have suffered an injury by the acts of the accused;

Although it is alleged to the purport that it is difficult to view the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this Court, that is, the Defendant appears to have worked as a considerable physical power on the part of the victim so-called the victim so-called the victim so-called the victim's rear hysa and hysa by entering the victim's rear hysa and hysa, and the victim's body seems to have worked as a considerable impact on the hysa of the victim so-called the victim's hysa, even though the victim did not go beyond, it appears that there was a considerable impact on the hysa, and there

In light of the fact that there is no ground to view, the victim suffered injury due to the defendant's act.

Therefore, this part of the argument is not acceptable.

2...