1. Revocation of the first instance judgment.

2. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

3. All costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the instant disposition

A. On January 12, 2012, the Plaintiff, at around 08:40, filed an application for medical care benefits with the Defendant, on the ground that the Plaintiff suffered from “the instant accident” (hereinafter referred to as “the instant accident”) at a height of 1.2 meters above that of the removal of the wall in the first floor of the hotel for each hotel located in Cheongju-si (hereinafter referred to as “the instant accident”).

B. The Defendant: (a) although it is recognized that there is a proximate causal relation with the instant accident, the Defendant rendered a disposition of non-approval of part of the medical care, on the ground that there is no proximate causal relation with the instant accident on the ground that the instant accident is confirmed on the Round of the Madle Madle Madle Madle Madle Madle Madle Madle Madle Madle Madle Madles

C. As to this, the Plaintiff filed a request for examination with the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Review Committee, but the request for review was rejected, and again filed a request for reexamination with the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Review Committee, and the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Review Committee revoked the Defendant’s partial approval of medical care on the ground that the “the instant case is found to have a proximate causal relationship between the Defendant’s work and the service.”

Accordingly, on October 24, 2012, the Plaintiff was receiving medical treatment for the instant injury and closed medical treatment, and thereafter filed a claim for disability benefits. On November 2, 2012, the Defendant determined the disability grade as class No. 14 subparag. 10 (hereinafter “instant disposition”) (hereinafter “the instant disposition”) by determining that the Plaintiff’s disability grade remains as a general East with the Plaintiff on Nov. 2, 2012.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, Eul evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination on the legitimacy of the instant disposition

A. The plaintiff's assertion is now far away from the bridge due to the injury and disease of this case.