logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2016.05.17 2016고정380
도로교통법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is engaged in the business of driving 50cc or obs without a license plate.

A. Defendant 1 driven the above vehicle and proceeded with the intersection of the Gu office distance of Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Yongsan-gu, 341(Gu) toward the direction of the Yongsan-gu Police Station on the front side of Yongsan-gu. In order to the end, Defendant 1 driven the above vehicle, and proceeded with approximately 30 km of the Sinsan Police Station.

The signal, etc. was installed at the front of that place, and in such cases, if the signal, etc. is changed from green to yellow on-off, etc., a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle shall not enter the intersection and have a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by driving safely.

Nevertheless, after the signal, etc. was changed to yellow on and off, the signal, etc. continued to proceed to the intersection even after the signal was changed to red, and the signal in the intersection was changed to red, and then the victim B (54 ) who was sent to U.S. according to the new code, conflict with the front part of U.S. O. on the right side of the Csch motor vehicle driven by U.S. in accordance with the new code.

Accordingly, the defendant suffered physical damage equivalent to KRW 7,289,590 from occupational negligence.

(b) Any person who violates the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Insurance shall buy mandatory insurance in order to operate automobiles on the road;

Nevertheless, the Defendant, on December 8, 2015, operated approximately 500 meters from the front side of the Yongsan-gu Seoul Yongsan apartment to the front side of the Gu office building distance, around 06:10 on December 8, 2015, the Defendant, who did not purchase a mandatory insurance policy and operated a bicycle with 50 c motor device without a license plate.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A survey report on actual condition and a report on internal investigation (as to a violation of signalling the ozone layer);

1. Each written statement B and D;

1. Application of written estimates and mandatory insurance-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act, Article 46 (2) 2 of the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation Act, and the main sentence of Article 8 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act (the point of operating a vehicle with no mandatory insurance) concerning facts constituting an offense;

arrow