logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2017.03.30 2016고단1041
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Criminal facts

On April 26, 2010, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 1.5 million by the Ulsan District Court for a violation of the Road Traffic Act, and a fine of KRW 5 million by the same court on March 19, 2015.

"2016 Highest 1041"

1. On March 12, 2016, the Defendant driven a motor vehicle with alcohol content of 0.069% at around 23:25, without obtaining a driver’s license, from the Do in front of the Do in front of the Do in front of the Do in front of the Do in the Do in the Do in the Do in the Do in the Do in the Do in the Do in the Do in the Do in the Do in the front of the Do in the Do in the front of the Do in the city in

As a result, the Defendant violated the prohibition of drinking alcohol driving regulations not less than twice but passed a motor vehicle again under the influence of alcohol, while driving a motor vehicle without obtaining a driver's license.

2. No person is allowed to operate an automobile which is not covered by mandatory insurance, but the Defendant operated a b car without mandatory insurance at the above time and at the above place.

"2016 Highest 2151"

3. On May 4, 2016, the Defendant driven a motor vehicle with alcohol content of 0.077% at around 20:32, without obtaining a driver’s license, from around 0.07% in the influence of alcohol during blood, the Defendant driven a vehicle B in the section of about 500 meters from the front of the galking smart road in the Modern East-dong Eup at racing-si to the front of the road of the Mod rice dial seed mosing.

As a result, the Defendant violated the prohibition of drinking alcohol driving regulations not less than twice but passed a motor vehicle again under the influence of alcohol, while driving a motor vehicle without obtaining a driver's license.

4. No one shall operate a motor vehicle which is not covered by mandatory insurance, but the Defendant operated a b car without mandatory insurance at the above time and at the above place.

Summary of Evidence

"2016 Highest 1041"

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the accused;

1. A report on the detection of a primary driver;

arrow