Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months, by imprisonment for ten months, and by imprisonment for eight months, respectively.

except that this shall not apply.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On September 3, 2014, Defendant A was sentenced to one year of a suspended sentence of six months for a violation of the Specialized Credit Financial Business Act by the Incheon District Court on the 12th of the same month. The judgment was finalized on September 3, 2014. Defendant B was sentenced to two years of a suspended sentence to one year of imprisonment for a violation of the Specialized Credit Financial Business Act at the Incheon District Court on September 3, 2014.

【Criminal Facts】

Defendant

B A. A. A. A. a person operating an illegal business entity (hereinafter referred to as “principal business entity”) such as accepting sales slips prepared in the name of the said leased franchise store from the owner of the business after lending the name of “F” to an entertainment drinking club or a commercial entertainment business establishment that is not a credit card company but is unable to take over credit card sales slips because it is not a credit card company. Defendant A is an employee who conducts entertainment tavern water and sales slips management, etc., and Defendant C is in a de facto marital relationship with Defendant B.

1. Joint criminal conduct by Defendant B and Defendant C

A. The Defendants conspired to seek the so-called “bagogy president” as they had been punished several times due to the violation of the Specialized Credit Financial Business Act when Defendant B operated the above main business before, and had been punished several times due to the violation of the Specialized Credit Financial Business Act.

Defendant

B made a proposal that “A shall be paid KRW 2,00,000 per month in lieu of giving the head of the branch office if this case is under control to an investigation agency, while serving as an employee,” and that “A shall be paid KRW 3,00,000 per month in the case of harsh detention.” In addition, A was employed as an employee of this case.

After that, around May 2010, the Defendants were investigated by the police with respect to the main body of the business, and around that time, they were investigated by A as if they were the president of the main body of the business.