1. Defendant Bohalog Electric Co., Ltd. refers to the obligation amount of Defendant Bohalog Electric Co., Ltd. in the attached Table 1 list to the Plaintiffs.

1. As to the claim against Defendant Boen Electricity Co., Ltd.

A. The Plaintiffs entered into a contract for goods supply with Defendant Bo halog Electric Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Bo halog Electricity”) and supplied goods accordingly. Defendant Bohalog Electric Co., Ltd., as a part of the price of the goods, is liable to pay each goods price and each damages for delay as indicated in the “the amount of debt of Defendant Bohalog Electric” in the attached Table 1 that the Plaintiffs seek as part of the price of the goods.

(b) Grounds for recognition: Judgment on deemed confession (Article 208 (3) 2 of the Civil Procedure Act);

C. The service date of a copy of the complaint: As to the claim against the defendant Tae-man corporation on June 2, 2013

A. The plaintiffs asserted (1) The plaintiffs asserted that the plaintiffs and the defendant Thai-man Co., Ltd. (hereinafter "the defendant Thai-man") form a claim group to secure and recover claims against the defendant Bo halog Electric. The defendant Thai-man delegated all the rights to claim management to the defendant Thai-man Co., Ltd. and the defendant Thai-man Co., Ltd., Ltd., and the defendant Thai-man agreed to allocate the amount recovered from the defendant Bo halog Electric to the ratio of the claims to the creditors. The defendant Thai-man collected KRW 226,984,194, and did not distribute it to the plaintiffs. Accordingly, in accordance with the agreement of the claim group of this case, the defendant Thai-man did not claim that the above 226,984,194, and the total amount of claims between the plaintiffs and the defendant Thai-man were distributed to the plaintiffs at the ratio of the total amount of claims 1,750,060,324,394,3294.

(2) Defendant Thai-man’s assertion that Defendant Thai-man joined the instant claim group.