logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2017.06.20 2016가단67044
계약금 등 반환청구
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is a corporation with the purpose of housing construction business, real estate rental business, etc., and the Defendant is the owner of Ulsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 258§³ and ground reinforced concrete and brick sloping roof, five-story neighborhood living facilities and housing (hereinafter “instant real estate”).

B. On March 11, 2006, the Defendant concluded a sales contract with Doodi Co., Ltd. with respect to the instant real estate with respect to the following content:

◎ 부동산의 표시 : 울산 남구 C 토지 258㎡ 및 건축물 896.13㎡ 지상 지하물 포함. ◎ 매매대금 : 15억 원, 계약금 1억 5,000만 원은 사업대상부지 전체면적의 지주 90% 날인시 지급하고, 나머지 잔금은 사업 승인 후 30일 이내로 일시 지급. ◎ 매도인 : 피고 ◎ 매수인 : 주식회사 지.

(h)D, and one other (the seal affixed to the company outside Korea)

C. After that, around April 2006, the Defendant concluded a new sales contract for the instant real estate (hereinafter “instant sales contract”) with the Nonparty Company, and the content thereof are as follows.

◎ 매매대금 총액 : 14억 원 (계약금 7억 원 2006. 4. 25.까지 지불, 잔금 7억 원 2006. 7. 30.까지 지불) ◎ 매도인 : 피고 ◎ 매수인 : ㈜ 지.

아이.디 외 1인 (소외 회사의 도장만 날인) ◎ 특약사항 : 본 건물의 임대 명도 건은 매도인이 2006. 8. 30.까지 100% 문제 없이 책임 진다. 라.

On April 25, 2006, the Plaintiff transferred the down payment KRW 700 million under the instant sales contract to the Defendant’s national bank account in the name of the Plaintiff.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5 (including additional number), and the purport before oral argument

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiff's summary of the plaintiff's assertion is the status of joint purchaser with the non-party company as to the sales contract of this case. The defendant's assertion did not lead to commencement of the contract of this case.

arrow