All appeals filed by the prosecutor against the Defendants are dismissed.

1. According to the summary of the grounds of appeal by J, K’s investigative agency’s statement, investigation report of a buying business entity prepared by M, etc., it is sufficiently recognized that the money paid by Defendant B to Defendant A was a consideration for an unlawful solicitation.

In addition, it constitutes an illegal solicitation in light of social rules or the good faith principle that Defendant A’s preparing a drawing reflecting the open studs and without going through the internal decision-making process, Defendant A, not the purchasing team, actually inspected G; Defendant B did not follow the ordinary procedure to process defects; and Defendant B received money from Defendant B and required the cooperation company to repair defects.

Nevertheless, the lower court found the Defendant not guilty of each of the facts charged of this case.

2. The lower court found the Defendant not guilty of each of the facts charged of this case, while sufficiently explaining the grounds for the judgment.

Examining the evidence legitimately adopted and examined by the court below in light of the records, the above judgment of the court below is just and acceptable, and there is no illegality of misconception of facts as pointed out by the prosecutor, and thus the prosecutor's assertion is not accepted.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.