The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. The sentence imposed by the lower court (six months of imprisonment) on the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The phishing crime aided and aided by the Defendant is a fraud crime committed against many and unspecified persons on a systematic basis, and the harm of which is enormous and requires strict punishment.

The defendant, even though being aware that he will be used in the crime, provided the account number to the phishing organization and released and delivered the money obtained by deception, and eventually, the above crime committed by the defendant by the defendant resulted in aiding and abetting the phishing crime.

The defendant committed the crime only once.

However, in full view of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant recognized the instant crime; (b) the Defendant was not a principal offender; (c) the degree of participation in the instant crime is low; and (d) the Defendant appears to have failed to gain any particular benefit from the instant crime; (b) the Defendant’s age, sex and environment; (c) the means and consequence of the instant crime; and (d) the circumstances after the commission of the crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is with merit, and the judgment of the court below is reversed in accordance with Article 364 (6) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and it is again decided as follows after pleading.

[Re-written judgment] The summary of facts constituting an offense and evidence recognized by the court and the summary of the evidence are the same as the stated in each corresponding column of the judgment below, and thus, they are cited in accordance with Article 369 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

Application of Statutes

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Articles 347(1), 32(1) (a)) of the Criminal Act, Articles 352, 347(1), and 32(1) (a) (a) of the Criminal Act, Articles 352, 347(1), and 32(1) of the Criminal Act, and each choice of imprisonment with labor;

1. Article 32(2) of the Criminal Act mitigated for aiding and abetting, and Article 55(1)3 of the same Act

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the grounds for the above appeal)