1. Defendant E and Defendant G jointly share KRW 11,66,66,66, and KRW 9,44,444 to Plaintiff A, respectively.

1. The fact of recognition that Defendant E Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Co., Ltd.”) was contracted from Nonparty Co., Ltd., Ltd. to install the H Crerererererererererererererererererererererererererererererererererererererererererererererererererererererererererererererererererere

the contract was awarded.

On May 6, 2013, the network K (hereinafter referred to as “the network”) was employed by theJ and died of a snife and a snife pressured snife at the place of installation of the HV structure on June 15, 2013, when 08:55, in the process of checking the painting of the HV beam for the installation of the hV, in person at the site of installing the hV structure of the above HV, the snife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife.

Plaintiff

A is the spouse (the wife) of the deceased, and the children of the deceased B, C, and D are children of the deceased.

Defendant F is a person who was the representative director of the Defendant Company at the time the Defendant Company subcontracted the instant construction work to J and at the time of the instant accident.

[Ground for recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap

2. Whether to recognize liability for damages;

A. The Defendant Company and the Defendant G, as an incidental duty under the good faith principle accompanying the labor contract, are obligated to take necessary measures, such as improving the human and physical environment so that an employee does not harm his/her life, body, and health in the course of providing his/her labor. In cases where an employee suffers damage by violating such a duty of protection, the Defendant G is liable to compensate for such damage (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 99Da6015, Mar. 10, 200; 99Da47129, May 16, 200; 99Da47129, May 16, 200).