A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

around 2006, the defendant sold to D a personal taxi license of KRW 61.6 million, but the above taxi license was revoked due to the failure of the defendant's aptitude test.

In this regard, C decided to conduct an administrative appeal on the disposition of revocation.

C was promised by the defendant to receive the welfare money of the defendant equivalent to KRW 12 million under the pretext of penalty, etc., and around November 26, 2006, E had E find the above welfare money of the defendant.

After winning the above administrative appeal, the defendant paid C the above KRW 12 million, and C returned part of it to C.

around April 8, 2013, the Defendant: (a) at the public service center of the Seoul Gangnam Police Station located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, on August 16, 2006, the Defendant submitted a petition to the effect that “D is unable to obtain the above license due to the cancellation of a personal taxi license due to the Defendant’s failure to undergo an aptitude test; (b) the Defendant’s appointment of an attorney-at-law should be decided; (c) the Defendant changed the welfare amount of KRW 12 million that the Defendant can find at the Seoul Metropolitan Private Taxi Association; and (d) the Defendant consented to this; and (c) around November 26, 2006, D received the above KRW 12 million from the Seoul Private Taxi Association and the welfare department of the Seoul Metropolitan Government, but obtained the above KRW 12 million from the attorney-at-law without using the attorney-law; and (d) on October 8, 2013, the Defendant did not request the above head of the Dong to appoint the attorney-at-law at the above public service office.”

However, the fact that D did not demand the defendant to pay 12 million won as the cost of attorney appointment, and C received the above welfare money as stated in the premise.

Accordingly, the defendant is D.