1. As to the Plaintiff’s rehabilitation claim against the Defendant, KRW 379,33,00 and KRW 327,052,00 among them, the Plaintiff’s rehabilitation claim is from November 13, 2012.

1. The following facts may be found either in dispute between the parties or in full view of the purpose of each of the testimony and arguments and arguments in Gap's 1 to 8, 13 through 17, 26, 32 and 34, and Eul's 1 to 12 (including each number, if any; hereinafter the same shall apply), witness B, and C.

The relationship between the parties and the developments leading up to the development of the hub in the instant case. The Plaintiff is a corporation with the purpose of the manufacture and sale business of vehicles and mid-term auxiliary equipment, etc., and the Plaintiff took over the legal proceedings on April 10, 2014 as Busan District Court Decision 2014 Gohap2 on April 10, 2014, with respect to Musco Co., Ltd. prior to the filing of the instant lawsuit.

The following is jointly referred to as the “Defendant” without distinguishing the manager A of the Defendant Rehabilitation Co., Ltd., Ltd. from the receiver A after taking over the lawsuit with the Defendant Co., Ltd. before taking over the lawsuit.

(2) On June 25, 2008, the Plaintiff entered into an agreement with the Korea Institute of Industrial Technology for the development of a new product under a condition of purchase (hereinafter referred to as the “instant BrC”) of the high speed vehicle (KTX) disc product (hereinafter referred to as the “KTX disc”) on the “new product development project” between the Korea Institute of Industrial Technology and the Korea Institute of Industrial Technology. After completing the development of the said BrC, the Plaintiff submitted a final report on the development of the new product to the Minister of Trade, Industry and Energy on September 2010, and the Korea Railroad Corporation, the sole supplier of the said BrC, issued a written confirmation to the effect that the aforementioned BrC was evaluated as a “new product development project” in accordance with the instant new product development agreement.

B. After entering into the instant disc supply contract between the Plaintiff and the Defendant, the Plaintiff and the Defendant on August 12, 201 (hereinafter “instant disc”).