logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2017.06.02 2015가단22641
손해배상(자)
Text

The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff A KRW 54,936,042, KRW 30,624,028, respectively, and each of them shall be from September 11, 2014 to September 2017.

Reasons

The fact that the liability for damages is established E driving a F vehicle at around 23:00 on September 11, 2014 (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant vehicle”) and became the front distance of the H pharmacy located in Yansan-gu G in Jeonju-si.

Defendant vehicles received network K (hereinafter referred to as “the network seal”) crossing from the H pharmacy to the J commercial slope due to the negligence of neglecting the right-hand turn from the I apartment room to the JG due to the negligence of neglecting the right-hand turn-on.

(A) No. 1, and the above accident (hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). The Deceased died on May 4, 2016 while receiving treatment of the instant accident.

(A) The plaintiff A is the deceased's spouse, and the plaintiff B and C are the children of the deceased.

(A) The defendant is an insurer who has entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with respect to the defendant vehicle.

According to the above facts of recognition of liability, the defendant is liable for damages suffered by the deceased and their families due to the accident of this case as the insurer of the defendant vehicle.

However, the deceased was negligent at the time of the accident, which contributed to the occurrence of the accident of this case, and the defendant's responsibility is limited to 70% in consideration of all the circumstances, including the fact that the road of this case is a four-lane road divided into India and roadways.

In addition to the matters stated separately below the scope of liability for damages, each of the relevant items in the attached Form of the calculation table of damages (including the calculation table of expenses for nursing) shall be as follows.

The defendant asserts that the causal relationship between the accident of this case and the death of the deceased does not exist between the accident of this case and the brain death or death of the deceased.

The direct cause of the death of the deceased is the smoking pulmonary and cerebral chlolapsy.

(A) Nos. 8 and 9. However, the Deceased has no multi-locks, such as an open upper room of the hand saws immediately after the accident of this case, four or more cages, cages, and two or more cages.

arrow