A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 00:55 on March 22, 2014, the Defendant expressed that “the drinking value has been too high” to D, the main place of business of Ulsan-gu, U.S., and caused disturbance to go beyond a string line at that place, and upon receiving the said 112 report from the head of the above main place of business, the Defendant sent to the said main place of business, G, and G, upon receiving the said 112 report.

The Defendant: (a) committed a disturbance to the police officers, and (b) committed assault against G, who took a scam of the scam of the scam of the above G, with his hand, on two occasions the chests of the above G; (c) followed by three times the scam of the scam of the head.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers in relation to criminal investigation, and at the same time put G police officers for approximately two weeks of medical treatment to the above victim G.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Relevant Articles 136(1) and 257(1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime; Articles 136(1) and 257(1) of the Criminal Act

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The scope of final sentence due to the aggravation of multiple principal offenders in the basic area (in the case of obstruction of performance of official duties and coercion of duties) of category 1 (In April to June) and the basic area (in the case of injury by general), category 1 (in the case of injury by general), category 1 (in the case of obstruction of performance of duties and coercion of duties) and the scope of final sentence due to the aggravation of multiple principal offenders: June to February 2 (in the case of suspension of performance of duties and coercion of duties): June to February (in the case of a decision of sentence] of February to February (in the case of a decision of sentence] of the reasons for the sentencing of Article 62-2(1) of the Criminal Act. It is not good that the police officer

It shall be considered that the police officer of 2002 has been sentenced to imprisonment for the same kind of crime with injury, for 10 months, and for 2 years of suspended execution under the unfavorable circumstances.

However, the degree of injury is minor, and mistake is recognized.