All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The punishment of the court below against the defendant (two years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

[Defendant’s defense counsel added the argument that it was not guilty on June 2, 2015, which was not timely filed on June 2, 2015, because there was no scope of defraudation, but on the third day of the trial, the Defendant’s defense counsel added the argument that it was not guilty. However, even if matters not included in the statement of grounds of appeal filed within the period for submission of legitimate grounds of grounds of appeal are stated in the appellate court, it cannot be deemed that there were grounds for appeal as alleged in the statement (see Supreme Court Decision 98Do1234, Sept. 22, 1998). Thus, this cannot be deemed a legitimate grounds for appeal, and even

The sentence of the lower court against the Defendant by the Prosecutor is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. The circumstances are favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant has no record of the same crime, the defendant seems to have caused the crime of this case somewhat incomplete, and there are circumstances to be considered in light of the circumstances, and the fact that the defendant seems to have made his own efforts to recover from damage after the crime of this case.

However, there is no particular relationship or change in circumstances that can reduce the above punishment in the trial because the amount obtained by deception against the victims of the crime of this case is the sum of KRW 500 million, and the actual damage recovery seems to have not been realized. In addition, various sentencing conditions provided for in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, circumstances before and after the crime, etc., various sentencing conditions provided for in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive of the crime, means and result, and the sentencing guidelines for the enactment of the Supreme Court's Sentencing Commission (general fraud) group, Type 3 (one-third of the sentencing minimum sentence shall be mitigated because the sum of the amounts of fraud by the victims of the crime of this case increases in one step as a result of combination