A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 15, 2015, the Defendant issued a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant, on January 15, 2015, 2015, issued to the victim D, who operated the Dagdong Csa in Daegu Lamba, Daegu Lbagu, Daegu, on the Haman (Tgu, Daegu) B, “The Defendant would have his well-known child in the E bank get a loan at a low interest rate on the security of Mags or buildings.” On February 15, 2015, the Defendant introduced the victim F, an employee of the Samdongdong branch of the E Bank, the E Bank Youngdong branch, thereby allowing the victim to obtain a loan equivalent to KRW 1.50 million from the E bank, and then thereafter, the Defendant changed the Defendant to the F, an employee in charge of the E bank, to grant a high interest rate of KRW 20 million.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not think that he would have received money from the F, who is an employee, and even if he received money from the victim for the purpose of receiving money from the victim, he thought that he had to have it.

Around February 16, 2015, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received KRW 20 million from the victim to the G Union account in the name of the Defendant and acquired it by defrauded.

2. On March 2015, 2015, the Defendant: (a) made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant would pay 50% of the principal as well as the profits of the principal to the victim as stated in the preceding paragraph of the preceding paragraph to the Hacheon-gu Police Officer on March 2015, 2015, an officetel located in the territory of the Republic of Korea is under auction; (b) the sales price of approximately 45% is awarded a successful bid at the price of about 65%; and (c) the H Bank and the H Bank will have become a fluencing fest and a short period of 6 months; and (d) the path will end within one year.”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not enter into a contract or agreement with I, a seller company of the above officetel, on the ground that it did not properly proceed with the sales consultation, and was obligated to pay approximately KRW 200 million in financial institutions and the National Tax Service, etc., and reached the officially announced land price in the golf course owned by the Defendant’s “J” corporation, which was operated by the Defendant.