The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below on the summary of the grounds for appeal (eight million won in penalty) is too unfluent and unfair.

2. The judgment of the Defendant committed the instant crime, which led to the instant crime, under which the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years and surveillance of protection for one year, due to the crime of obstructing the business of the victim D, who was divorced, even though he was under the suspended sentence of two years.

However, the defendant does not have access to the victims again during the confession of the crime of this case.

The sentence imposed by the court below cannot be deemed to be unfair because it is flick, in full view of various conditions of sentencing as shown in the records and arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, etc., and the fact that the parties agreed with the victims at the time of the trial.

3. Accordingly, the prosecutor’s appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.