logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구고등법원 2015.07.03 2015누4212
양도소득세부과처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The grounds for the plaintiff's assertion in the trial while filing an appeal is not significantly different from the contents of the plaintiff's assertion in the first instance court, and the judgment of the first instance court rejecting the plaintiff's assertion is justified even if both evidence submitted in the first instance court and the purport of the entire pleadings in the first instance court and the first instance court are examined.

Therefore, this court's explanation on this case is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where "report on real estate distance contract" between the fourth reduction in the fourth third reduction in the judgment of the court of first instance is deemed "report on real estate transaction contract" as "report on real estate transaction contract". Thus, this court cites it as it is in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit, and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow