Defendant

I shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,00, and by a fine of KRW 1,000,000, respectively.

The Defendants respectively.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant I around 14:40 on August 14, 2014, at the Busan Dong-gu LM parking lot, Defendant I set the time zone for the victim A (the 62 years of age) and the parking problem, was pushed down, was pushed down, and the part part of the victim's lubbow was set up once due to the Defendant's lub damage and lubow, and the victim's lusium and tensions were 14 days in order for the victim to receive medical treatment for 14 days.

2. Defendant A, at the time and place specified in paragraph (1), was sealed against the victim I (the age of 61), was pushed down against the victim I (the age of 61), and was placed on the victim’s right part with a lush hand once, thereby making the victim’s right part of the victim’s right part, which requires medical treatment for 14 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. The legal statement of the defendant I (as of the second trial date);

1. Each legal statement of witness I and N;

1. A photograph of the upper part of the body concerned (I);

1. The injury diagnosis statement (I), and the injury diagnosis statement (A) [the defendant A and the defense counsel submitted the recording recording of I as evidence while disputing the credibility of the injury diagnosis statement to I, but I stated from the investigative agency to the court of this Court that the defendant A and the defendant A met the above statement, that the part of the injury stated in the above injury diagnosis statement was consistent with the above statement, that the doctor's diagnosis was diagnosed through radiation photographing and duplicative tests, and that the statement of I expressed in the above record is sufficiently recognized in light of the following factors: the credibility of the above injury diagnosis statement is fully recognized;

1. Relevant Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act and the Defendants’ choice of punishment for the crime: the Defendants’ choice of fine

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Defendant A and the defense counsel’s assertion and judgment under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act; even if Defendant A’s losses were incurred, they merely constitute self-defense for the purpose of setting up against I’s unfair infringement. However, this Court is legitimate.