1. The Defendant’s motion against the Plaintiff has the executory power in Daejeon District Court Decision 2012Gahap2586, the damages claim against the Plaintiff.

(d) ;

B. B withdraws the appeal case of the above Supreme Court by November 28, 2014.

(e) A and B shall immediately apply for an order to institute a suit against the provisional seizure of claims against B.

If there is a filing of a lawsuit against this, Gap and Eul shall jointly respond to it.

In addition, if the result of the lawsuit on the merits becomes final and conclusive as against B, Eul shall immediately make the judgment against B.

subsection (b) shall be paid the amount of money in subsection (b). If B partially won, Eul shall pay the remainder after deducting the amount to be paid to B, and if B shall pay 50,000,000 won to B as a third party debtor, as Eul has partly won, Eul shall pay the remainder of 45,00,000 won to B.

A. In such cases, A shall immediately withdraw the provisional attachment of the real estate owned by B.

3. A and B, as a kind of friendship, agree to resolve the previous implied appraisal and to reach an original agreement, and they undertake to ensure that any person does not disclose the terms of this agreement.

**C has entrusted D with all of them by wire without attending the agreed place, and C has affixed a seal imprint affixed to a separate document to the effect that the above agreement is later recognized, and affixed a seal imprint affixed thereto.

In addition, A is replaced by issuing identification cards and certificates of seal imprint because it does not have a seal imprint, and it is replaced by affixing a seal.

(2) On December 2, 2014, as stipulated in the instant agreement, C confirmed the agreement on December 2, 2014 between the principal and D, and A, and issued to the Plaintiff with a certificate of personal seal impression attached thereto. (3) The Defendant filed a lawsuit against C on October 150, 2014, with the claim for return of unjust enrichment based on the creditor’s subrogation right of 150,000,000 won as of October 20, 2014 as the claim for return of unjust enrichment under the creditor’s subrogation right of 2014Kadan10576 of this Court.