Defendant

A, D, E, F, H, I, J, L, N,O, and R shall be punished by a fine of 30,00 won, Defendant B, C, G, K, M, P, Q, Q, and R, respectively.

Punishment of the crime

No teacher of a national or public school who is a State public official shall support any specific political party or political organization with money or material for political purposes, whatever the pretext it is.

In addition, anyone may not contribute political funds in a way that is not provided for in the Political Funds Act, and in particular, from March 13, 2006, anyone may not contribute political funds directly to a political party including the form of abolition of a political party’s supporters’ association and leading to a political party’ association.

1. Defendant A (201st class 1346) was appointed as a teacher of a national or public school on July 22, 1977, and is currently in service as a member of a W middle school. A

On or before June 23, 2002, the Defendant applied for the “Automatic Payment through the Cmp transfer method” to a X political party and applied for the “Automatic Payment through the Cmp transfer method” on or around July 26, 2006, by means of the Cmp transfer method to the financial settlement center located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan City (Seoul), and stated that the Defendant paid KRW 10,000 to the X-party account from the Defendant’s Jeonbuk Bank account to the X-gu branch bank account in Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, the Defendant paid KRW 10,00 to the X party account; however, the evidence submitted by the Prosecutor alone is insufficient to recognize the Defendant as the “party membership fee” with the amount transferred to the X-party account; Provided, That it

On the other hand, the establishment of the crime of violating the Political Funds Act depends on whether the above money was donated by means not stipulated in the Political Funds Act, and the conclusion does not vary depending on whether the nature of the money is party membership fee, and even if the defendant asserts the above money as a support fund and recognized it as a "support fund" in this case, it is judged that there is no substantial disadvantage to the defendant's exercise of his right to defense. Thus, this part is modified to "support fund" and recognized as a "support fund.

2. On January 2, 200