logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.04.27 2014구합346
유족급여 및 장의비부지급처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff’s husband’s husband (CB, hereinafter “the deceased”) worked as D at the Ganchi Trade Co., Ltd. Dovido factory and operated the E Co., Ltd. jointly with the Plaintiff from January 1, 2006 to September 26, 2010. From September 26, 2010 to March 1, 2012, the Plaintiff worked as a management position.

B. On December 16, 1997, the Deceased continued to show a pain and chest low symptoms during the performance of his duties at the Glim Trade Co., Ltd., and on December 19, 1997, the chest was diagnosed as a result of the diagnosis after he was locked at his home, and the chest was diagnosed as a “sinfluence color certificate” (hereinafter “the first heart color certificate”), and the Defendant was determined to approve the medical care for the above disease due to an occupational disease, but the Defendant was also determined to approve the medical care for the above disease. In addition, the Defendant applied for the medical care, and the non-approval was determined as to the sincopic scoperosis and the high blood pressure.

After that, on May 30, 2005, the Deceased was judged as class 5 of the disability grade after the treatment of the above injury or disease was completed.

C. On February 18, 2013, the Deceased was hospitalized due to the symptoms of the body death at the relevant hospital due to the symptoms of the body death, and was discharged on March 7, 2013, when the condition was deteriorated, and was discharged on March 7, 2013. On March 8, 2013, the Deceased died on March 16, 2013, when he/she was transferred to the middle patient room at the same hospital as of March 9, 2013 through the emergency room at the relevant hospital at the relevant hospital.

The deceased’s death diagnosis is written as follows: (a) direct death by the heart death; (b) an interim line event; (c) an acute alarm color (hereinafter “second core color”); (d) the preceding physician’s death examination; (b) the first physician’s death examination; and (c) the first physician’s death examination; and (d) the first physician’s death examination; (d) the first physician’s death examination;

The Plaintiff alleged that the deceased’s death constitutes occupational accidents, and claimed for the payment of survivors’ benefits and funeral expenses. However, the Defendant on June 4, 2013, on the ground that there is no medical proximate causal relation between the death of the deceased’s death and the first heart color on the ground that there is no medical causal relation between the death and the deceased’s death.

arrow