The Defendants, not guilty, dismissed the application for compensation by the applicant for compensation.

1. The Defendants in the facts charged of the instant case have concluded a farming contract with farmers and paid the price by getting farmers cultivate crops, such as spawn, spawn and spawn, etc., and have been harvested and shipped.

Since the spring in 2009, the Defendants have colored investors because there was a shortage of agricultural products to be paid to farmers while growing up approximately 200,000 square meters of a dry field in Taecheon-si.

At around May 2009, Defendant B introduced the victim K(37 years of age) to the effect that “an investment in a dry field of fish farming in Gangwon-do. A also invested in KRW 1 billion.” Defendant B introduced the victim himself as a field of fish farming in Jindo-gun and recommended the victim to continuously invest in the field of fish farming in Jindo-gun after moving the victim into the field of fish farming in Jindo-gun.

After that, on August 28, 2009, the Defendants recommended the victims to show and make an investment in a dry field with a high-quality farming field, including a dry field in which the Defendants grow under contract, and Defendant A invested an amount of KRW 450,000,000 in 48,000,000,000 from the 29th day of August 29, 2009, Defendant A promoted the victim to the effect that “The amount of KRW 50,000,000,000,000 won was added to the management expenses up to the time of shipment, and the amount of KRW 25,00,000,000,000,000,000 won is to be paid back to the victim,” and Defendant B demanded the victim to make an investment in the side of the horse.

However, the fact is that the ship field (a ship field under contract cultivation with the aboveO) in which the defendants want to sell to the victims was not a ship paddy field in a state of low-quality from among the ship paddy field shown to the victims on the preceding day, but can not be shipped to the victims prior to drilling.