logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2018.06.19 2018나102056
물품대금
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. According to the overall purport of Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2-1 through 5, Gap evidence Nos. 3 and 4 as to the cause of the claim and the whole purport of the pleadings, the plaintiff was engaged in a live-line retail business with the trade name of "C". The defendant was engaged in a marriage-type rental business, etc., and the defendant was actually engaged in a marriage-type rental business. Upon the defendant's request, the plaintiff supplied the above company with goods of fishery products, etc. from September 7, 2017 to September 22, 2017, and the fact that the amount the defendant paid to the plaintiff out of the price of the above goods was 23,619,800.

According to the above facts, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff 23,619,800 won for the unpaid goods and damages for delay calculated at the rate of 6% per annum prescribed by the Commercial Act from September 23, 2017 to November 9, 2017, which is the service date of the original copy of the payment order in this case, and 15% per annum prescribed by the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings from the next day to the day of full payment.

2. As such, the plaintiff's claim shall be accepted for the reasons for the conclusion, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just for the conclusion, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit, and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow