logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2017.12.13 2017고단1777
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 25, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment of 1 year and 10,000 won for a crime of fraud at the Seoul Central District Court on February 25, 2015, and completed the execution of the sentence in the astronomical Prison on August 16, 2016.

Criminal facts

1. Crimes against victims D;

A. A. On September 1, 2016, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that he/she would repay the victim D’s construction site and KRW 200,000 if he/she borrowed KRW 2 million.

However, the defendant did not have property and did not have any intention or ability to pay the money even if he borrowed money from the damaged person.

The Defendant, in its possession, received 200,000 won from the injured party as the borrowed money from the seat to January 13, 2017, as well as from January 13, 2017, the Defendant’s “cash” in the column 12 No. 12 of the crime sight table to the account transfer.

In the same way as the statement, 230,000 won was delivered to the injured party in total at least 21 times.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

B. On January 16, 2017, the Defendant stolen 50,000 won in cash owned by the victim at the victim’s residence located in Suwon-si, Gyeonggi-do, and between the victim and the toilet.

2. On September 1, 2016, the criminal defendant against the victim G made a false statement to the effect that he/she would be repaid if he/she lends money to the victim G, by introducing the victim G with his/her own motor vehicle business and the victim G with a re-power holding a major apartment with a major apartment with a face value of three billion won.

However, in fact, the defendant did not run a motor vehicle business, did not own a main apartment of KRW 3 billion, and did not own a main apartment, and since he did not have any property and did not have any income, he/she is willing or ability to repay it even if he/she borrowed money from the damaged.

arrow