logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2017.11.03 2017고정480
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a radar car.

On January 21, 2017, the Defendant came to proceed at an influench speed in the direction of the Jinancheon-gun, the direction of the Jinancheon-gun, in the direction of the Jinancheon-gun, in the direction of the Jinancheon-gu, Seocheon-gu., the listed Ri would cross-market in the direction of the listing.

At this point, there is a duty of care to see the front side and safely drive the signal and lane to prevent accidents in advance. In such a case, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance.

Nevertheless, due to the negligence that the Defendant neglected the duty at the front of the passenger vehicle, and did not discover the victim's Category E-Motor vehicle quantity of the victim who was waiting to turn to the left at the front of the defendant's moving direction, and received the victim's passenger vehicle volume front side.

Ultimately, the Defendant did not immediately stop and take necessary measures while destroying the passenger car of the victim to the extent that the amount equivalent to KRW 665,428 is damaged by the above occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Written estimate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a fact-finding survey report and traffic accident occurrence report;

1. Article 148 of the relevant Act and Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the selection of fines concerning facts constituting an offense, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the Defendant left the scene without taking any measures against traffic accidents.

Although the defendant was punished for the same crime in the past, there is a high possibility of criticism in that the same crime has been committed in the past.

In addition, the defendant is punished for driving under drinking.

However, the defendant recognizes his mistake and is against his will.

(b) a victim;

arrow