1. As to shares 2/11 of the real estate listed in the Schedule,

A. It is limited to February 1, 2017 between the Defendant and D.

In full view of Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 4 as the ground for the claim, and the purport of the entire arguments, the Minister of Court Administration of this Court, and the head of Nowon-gu as to the fact that the plaintiff was ordered to pay KRW 16,570,878 against D (hereinafter referred to as "the non-party") on January 17, 2012 and the compensation for delayed payment thereof (Seoul East East Eastern District Court Decision 201Hu49762). After that, the non-party's heir E (hereinafter referred to as "the deceased") died on February 1, 2017 and succeeded to the non-party and the heir including the defendant on February 1, 2017, the above heir agreed to divide the inherited property to vest the apartment of this case as the sole owner of the defendant (hereinafter referred to as "consultation of this case"), and accordingly, the non-party's share ownership transfer registration of this case constitutes the non-party's share (the non-party's share ownership transfer registration of this case).

The agreement on the division of inherited property is to confirm the reversion of inherited property by either having all or part of the inherited property owned independently by each inheritor or having it performed as a new co-ownership relationship with respect to the inherited property which has already been temporarily owned by co-inheritors after the commencement of inheritance. Since it is a juristic act aimed at property rights in its nature, it may be subject to the exercise of the right to revoke a fraudulent act. Meanwhile, the debtor's act of selling real estate, which is one of his sole property, and replacing it with money easily consumed or transferring it free of charge to another person becomes a fraudulent act against the creditor, barring any special circumstances. Therefore, the debtor in excess of his/her obligation already