beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 36,127,90 and the Plaintiff’s annual rate of KRW 6% from January 9, 2016 to February 15, 2016, and the following.
Reasons
1. Summary of the parties' arguments;
A. The Plaintiff continues to supply packaging materials, etc. to C (representative D) or the Defendant from around 2010 to January 8, 2016, and the remaining attempted amount is KRW 36,127,90.
Since the defendant has taken over business by including the debt owed to the plaintiff or the defendant and C are practically the same as the defendant and C, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff 36,127,900 won, the total amount of the outstanding amount, and delay damages.
B. Since 30,799,000 won out of the amount to be sought by the Defendant was arising from the transactional relationship with “C” unrelated to the Defendant, the Defendant did not have an obligation to pay it, and the remainder of 5,328,90 won was fully repaid.
2. 청구원인에 관한 판단 갑 제3, 4, 7, 9, 10, 11호증(가지번호 있는 것은 가지번호 포함)의 각 기재와 변론 전체의 취지를 종합하면, 원고는 2009년 또는 2010년경부터 ‘C’라는 상호로 재활용업 등을 하는 D에게 이중장갑, 마대 등을 공급한 사실, 원고가 2013년경 ‘C’에게 물품을 공급하면서 발행한 각 거래명세표에 피고의 대표이사 E이 서명한 사실, 원고는 2014년경 피고에게 물품을 공급할 때마다 (피고의 상호와 함께) ‘C’의 상호를 병기하고 ‘C’에게 남아 있던 미수금을 표기한 거래명세표를 작성하여 건넸는데, 피고의 직원은 이에 대해 별다른 이의를 제기하지 아니하고 서명한 사실, 피고는 2015년경 ‘C’가 ‘(주) B’로 상호 변경을 한다는 취지가 포함된 개업식 초청문을 만들어 배부한 사실이 인정되고, 이에 의하면 피고는 ‘C’의 원고에 대한 채무를 인수하였다고 봄이 타당하다.
In full view of the evidence and the purport of the entire argument mentioned above, the fact that the Defendant’s remainder of the goods against the Plaintiff was 36,507,900 as of January 8, 2016, including the price for the goods against the Plaintiff.
Therefore, the defendant.