beta
Text
1. Revocation of the first instance judgment.
In Suwon District Court's case of the distribution procedure G dividend proceeding G, the above court on March 27, 2019.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. (1) The execution court’s distribution procedure for the distribution of the dividends and its objection (hereinafter “instant distribution procedure”) with respect to the deposit deposited under the jurisdiction of Suwon District Court Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch was 163,798,695 won, which is the date of distribution,
3) As to the distribution schedule with the content of the distribution schedule (hereinafter “instant distribution schedule”).
(1) The Defendants filed a suit against Defendant E 1 collection authority (U.S. District Court Decision 2018Kadan202838), Defendant E 1 collection authority (U.S. District Court Decision 2018Da31893, U.S. District Court Decision 2011, U.S. Supreme Court Decision 2011, U.S. Supreme Court Decision 2011, U.S. Decision 2011, U.S. Decision 2011, U.S. Decision 2018Da31893, U.S. Decision 2017T District Court Decision 201, U.S. Decision 2015Da3864) 25,206, U.S. Decision 201, U.S. Decision 2019Da3027,6425, Feb. 26, 2014).
B. The J Co., Ltd. of the first instance judgment against the Plaintiff (hereinafter “J”) filed a lawsuit claiming wages, etc. against the Plaintiff as Seoul Northern District Court Decision 2016Gahap22428, 22442 (Joint) and 22435 (Joint). On May 17, 2018, the said court rendered a judgment on May 17, 2018 that “the Plaintiff shall pay J 249,48,866 won and delay damages therefor, and the part ordering payment of the said money may be provisionally executed (hereinafter “instant first instance judgment”).
C. On June 7, 2018, Defendant E was issued a seizure and collection order against KRW 83,937,095 out of the claims based on the original copy of the rehabilitation creditors meeting with the Seoul Rehabilitation Court 2016 Gohap10203, based on the Seoul Rehabilitation Court’s executory power of rehabilitation cases (Seoul Northern District Court 2018 Doz. 20106934).