logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2019.10.31 2019누50306 (1)
국가유공자유족비해당결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows, except for the cases where the court attached the judgment of the plaintiff's assertion or attached the judgment of the plaintiff's assertion. The relevant reasons of the court of first instance are as follows.

Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act shall be quoted as it is.

2. On the 2nd page 5 of the first instance judgment, the body of the first instance judgment “the result of the physical examination on the classification of disability ratings with respect to urinology and high blood pressure recognized as potential aftereffects of defoliants” is as follows: “the result of the physical examination on the classification of disability ratings with respect to urinology, which was recognized as potential aftereffects of defoliants and recognized as potential aftereffects of defoliants,” respectively.

On the second page of the judgment of the first instance, the term "emergency deceased person" in the 6th sentence shall be read as "emergency deceased person".

The 5th parallel 3th parallel of the judgment of the first instance is " chronic renal failure due to disease" with " chronic renal failure due to disease from urology".

Part 6 of the judgment of the court of first instance is the 7th "Redive blood coloring factory" in the form of "Irrrrrrmoty coloring factory".

On the 8th page of the judgment of the first instance, the 2nd "brus" shall be raised to "virus".

No. 10 of the judgment of the first instance, No. 13 of the 10th judgment, “The instant difference” shall be considered as “urine disease recognized as actual aftereffects of defoliants.”

No. 12 of the judgment of the court of first instance, 2 of the judgment of the court of first instance, "Unslateral blood transfusion" is regarded as "slateral maternal blood transfusion certificate".

Under paragraph 7 of the judgment of the first instance court, the following 6th, 8th, 10th, 3th, and 11th, each "this court" shall be deemed to be "the first instance court".

3. The attached parts of the judgment of the court of first instance are attached to the following 7 pages 13 of the judgment of the court of first instance.

"The Deceased seems to have been likely to be accompanied by a dead climatic climatic disease because it is presumed that the period of climatic disease reaches 14 years and that the normal climatic disease was not well adjusted.

However, it is known that the deceased is the main risk factor of death and sacrife, blood pressure, smoking, etc., and the deceased is a high blood pressure.

arrow